Same Sex Marriage Do You Think This Constitutional - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 6 Words: 1944 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/02/05 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Same Sex Marriage Essay Did you like this example? Imagine if you had a child that love someone who has the same gender as them and wanted you to accept their love for each other by being there, would you attend the wedding? Some may say yes, and some might say no. Same sex marriage has been a controversy topic for the longest. Same sex marriage has been legalized since June 2015, this made a lot of people happy and some mad. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Same Sex Marriage Do You Think This Constitutional" essay for you Create order This law struct down all state ban on same-sex marriage , legalized it in all fifty states and required states to honor out-of-state same-sex marriage licenses in the case Obergefell v. Hodges . Same-sex marriage is the practice of marriage between two men or between two women. Although same-sex marriage has been regulated through law, religion, and custom in most countries of the world, the legal and social responses have ranged from celebration on the one hand to criminalization on the other. Ate doesn’t have complete freedom to decide who may and may not marry. The state’s involvement raises fundamental issues about equality of political and civic standing. Same-sex marriage is currently one of the most divisive political issues in our nation. In November 2008, Californians passed Proposition 8, a referendum that removed the right to marry from same-sex couples who had been granted that right by the courts. This result has been seen by the same-sex community as deeply degrading. More recently, Iowa and Vermont have legalized same-sex marriage, the former through judicial interpretation of the state constitution, the latter through legislation. All around the world, gay people are struggling to be approved legally and by society; however, their fight is definitely working, because this union is becoming more and more accepted globally. That doesn’t mean they should stop now, the battle for these rights is just beginning. Homosexual activities and relationships exist since human origins. Primitive men often engaged in sexual relationships to show and prove their masculinity; the Egyptians and Greeks also practiced this doings openly, as a way of expressing love or trying to copy the high classes and Gods. â€Å"Evidence exists that same-sex marriages were tolerated in parts of Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt. Artifacts from Egypt, for example, show that same-sex relationships not only existed, but the discovery of a pharaonic tomb for such a couple shows their union was recognized by the kingdom.† â€Å"Greek mythology recordsâ€Å"same-sex exploits† by gods as high ranking as Zeus. And the epics of Homer, the Iliad and the Odyssey, contain poetic passages that suggested homoerotic love to the educated hearer.† The point I’m aiming for at this moment, is to demonstrate that physical homosexual relations are a necessity for some, it’s an impulse stronger than their minds; early beginnings prove it. As humans we should not deny them the right to live freely and to be married, because this means you’re denying their right for happiness. Gay men and women should make their own decisions, without half of the world having something to say. â€Å"As of July 17, 2013, 14 out of 194 countries allow same-sex couples to marry: the Netherlands (2000), Belgium (2003), Canada (2005), Spain (2005), South Africa (2006), Norway (2009), Sweden (2009), Argentina (2010), Iceland (2010), Portugal (2010), Denmark (2012), Uruguay (2013), New Zealand (2013), and France (2013). Same-sex marriage is legal in some jurisdictions of Mexico, the United Kingdom, and the United States.† (https://gaymarriage.procon.org/). Having said that, it demonstrates how people is seeing the situation objectively nowadays, differing from the previous ten years. These countries catalogued themselves as first-world nations, implying the law is indispensable for social development. In other words, maybe not now, but at some point the country will need to approve the law if they seek for growth and expansion of their nation. A usual point of discussion is the truth about their odd tendency. Meaning there’s a popular belief, in which some people claim to be homosexual as a scream for attention. To be honest, it could happen, but do you imagine someone taking that amount of criticism, oppression, alienation, and hatred only for attention? Not likely. The real cause for homosexuality lies between the genes and the person’s behavior; however it’s mostly biological. â€Å"Most researchers find that homosexuality, like many others psychological conditions, is due to a combination of social, biological, or psychological factors. According to a study done by Simon LeVay, the brains of a group of gay men differed from those of straight men. Specifically, the nucleus of the hypothalamus, which triggers male-typical sex behavior, revealed a small, but significant difference in the clusters of neutrons of homosexual men as opposed to heterosexual men.’’ Having the previous statement in mind, wouldn’t they deserve reconsideration? Should they be a little more understood, knowing it’s not the life they have chosen? Another reason that brings same-sex marriage a lot of rejection, are the children. The moment a couple consumes marriage, kids are born as a symbol of their love, unity and legacy. It wouldn’t be any different if a homosexual couple unites legally. So, will their children be bullied? Will they be unhappy and miserable? â€Å"The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) continues to claim that children with gay parents suffer severe emotional and mental abuse, even going so far as to argue that they are more likely to become child molesters than children raised by heterosexual parents.† (https://www.huffingtonpost.com/) It’s a tough reality, but it makes a ton of sense. Having gay parents condemns a child for a life of mocking and sadness; projecting a poor and unsecure future for them. The refore, if gay marriage ever gets legalized, it should have some limits. Adopting children for starters. Speaking about limits, if homosexual marriage does get permitted, the gay community should have a series of boundaries. As mention before, adopting should be the primary and most important limit. In Russia, same-sex union isn’t allowed, and the country possesses a high grade of discipline toward the topic. The country has voided the right (three months ago) to adopt or raise children by same-sex couples living outside the nation. â€Å"President Vladimir Putin signed a law banning gay and lesbian couples in foreign countries from adopting Russian children. The measure was one of a series adopted by Russian authorities in recent weeks that have been slammed by civil rights leaders as discriminatory. The Kremlin said in a statement that the measure is aimed at guaranteeing a harmonious and full upbringing for children in adoptive families. It also bans adoption by unmarried individuals who live in countries with laws permitting same-sex marriages.† (https://www.huffington post.com/). Not marrying by the church should be another, because it is common by same-sex couples to demand the right to marry by the church; so that is definitely off limits. Signs of affection in schools, public offices, and churches should be forbidden. The previous paragraph was stated with the purpose to maintain peace, and to try to keep the public happy, if and only if the law passes. The clear intention from every government is to maintain peace, and order at every moment. With the approval of the marriage, some people will strongly disagree and may cause troubles and issues; therefore, these limits should be enforced so the disturbers avoid all type of conflict. If same-sex marriage does get allowed, will gays be finally happy? Even though, they are approved legally, will they be approved and accepted socially? Alienation, discrimination, disgusting looks in the street; those attitudes toward the homos will never go away, it won’t disappear. Let’s talk facts, if only 14 countries out of 194 have legalized the union, it means that only 7.2% percent of the world â€Å"likes† them. So is happiness granted for them? Absolutely not, therefore the government should think twice before even bringing the topic. From all the situations and possible scenarios mentioned before, society must occur. Positive impact: The legalization will definitely improve the way of living in many levels. No more riots disrupting roads, work, and the people’s health; more income: â€Å"Revenue from gay marriage comes from marriage licenses, higher income taxes (the so-called marriage penalty), and decreases in costs for state benefit programs. The Comptroller for New York City found that legalizing gay marriage would bring $142 million to the city’s economy and $184 million to the state’s economy over three years.† (https://gaymarriage.procon.org/). Legalizing same-sex marriage will not harm heterosexual marriages or family values, and civilization will remain the same and continue to function accurately. â€Å"Anthropological research supports the conclusion that a vast array of family types, including families built upon same-sex partnerships, can contribute to stable and humane s ocieties. (Social Science Quarterly). The human race has the tendency to ignore or even like some things when they are used too; consequently, when citizens get used to the idea (the ones who disagreed), they could even accept them, seeing there’s no harm done. Negative impact: Every good thing has flaws, so don’t get too excited if you are supporting this modern-times union. Undesirable things will occur, no doubt about it. The importance of the institution of marriage will decrease if gay couples are allowed to wed. â€Å"Traditional marriage is already threatened with high divorce rates (between 40% and 50%) and with 40.6% of babies being born to unmarried mothers in 2008. (https://gaymarriage.procon.org/). Adding to that, this odd union could present a danger for the involved parties in the making of the law, and the openly homosexual couples. Not all religions, could commit such a radical act, but don’t forget about the Muslims and their volatile behavior. â€Å"Gay marriage is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups.† (https://gaymarriage.procon.org/). Because of their inability to create offspring, marriage’s purpose will change forever. â€Å"Allowing gay marriage would only further shift the purpose of marriage from producing and raising children to adult gratification.† ((https://gaymarriage.procon.org/).This â€Å"new right† will damage the image of marriage; it will no longer be seen as sacred, and magical. The approval, will open up doors for another craze or obsession people will have. Drugs, public drinking, whorehouses, prostitution, will have the potential to be allowed. The nation will lose any kind of religion, and morals will be lower than ever. It’s up to you to decide whether you go with the positive or the negative impact. Which decision will influence our society the most? Are you willing to handle the consequences? Both decisions will cause effects; the trick is to choose the one that will be worth suffering for. Stop thinking about every issue, every situation, and every trouble you are going through right now, and think objectively: Will the decision improve somebody’s lifestyle? Or will it harm it? Will it truly help your nation? Will it create a better place to live? Or will it be a hostile environment? In conclusion, homosexual marriage should be legalized. It brings to the nation, more benefits that setbacks, and of course more capital. It might bring more happiness to certain individuals, than chaos for those who disagree. Maybe your nation isn’t ready, perhaps mine either; maybe isn’t the right time to say yes to the law. The point is, to be ready when the time comes, and it will be soon be sure of that. Perhaps one day our grandchildren will see this law, the same way we see today the discrimination of black people. Remember open your mind, be objective, and do what feels right. Works Cited â€Å"Statement on Same-Gender Marriage, September 20, 1996.† American Reference Library Primary Source Documents, Jan. 2001, p. 1. EBSCOhost, proxygsu-sbib.galileo.usg.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct

Theft in the Kite Runner - 1543 Words

During one’s life, they will be faced with situations that can influence the people surrounding them. The Kite Runner written by Khaled Hosseini a novel based on the life of Amir, the son of a well-off Pashtun. Amir spends the majority of his life trying to please, and receive affection from his father, Baba. Amir and Baba had two Hazara servants; Hassan, and Ali, Hassan’s father. Hassan and Amir have been friends since birth despite their different social classes. Hassan has always gained the affection of Baba with less effort than Amir has, and for that reason, Amir begins to resent Hassan. After a series of unfortunate events, Ali and Hassan made the decision to leave the company of Baba and Amir to start a new life in Hazarajat. Later†¦show more content†¦Baba asked Hassan, â€Å" Did you steal that money? Did you steal Amir’s watch, Hassan?† Hassan replied, â€Å"Yes.†(Hosseini 111) Even though Hassan did not steal those items from Am ir, he still took the blame to protect Amir from the consequences. Hassan had told Ali about what happened to him, and on top of this incident, Ali decided that they would leave Kabul. Assef is the antagonist in The Kite Runner. Assef was a Pashtun whose father was friends with Baba. He was very against Hazaras and Pashtuns becoming friends so he picked on and bullied Hassan and Amir for that reason. Assef had a mindset similar to Hitler’s in the sense that he wanted to eliminate a race of people: the Hazaras. Assef views the Hazara people as worthless so when he takes advantage of Hassan, he feels no guilt because he does not think of him as human. One of Assef’s friends protests that raping someone is ‘sinful’ he replies saying, â€Å"there’s nothing sinful about teaching a lesson to a disrespectful†¦ It’s just a Hazara.†(Hosseini80). Regardless of what Assef thought, Hassan was a person, and he lost his innocence when Assef raped him. This was illustrated when Amir describes Hassan’s face when he was being advantage of as, â€Å"the look of the lamb.†(Hosseini81). Throughout the novel, he remai ns a character with no conscience or remorse. Assef was the type of character who needs to feel in power over and victimizes the weak links. Later on in the novel when Amir goesShow MoreRelatedThe Kite Runner1069 Words   |  5 PagesWhat role did assef play in The Kite Runner? antagonist Who is rahim khan in The Kite Runner? Rahim Khan is Babas business partner and best friend. What is the mood of The Kite Runner? The mood of one flying a kite i would say is optimistic. Flying a kite doesnt always go as planned. What disease did Ali have in The Kite Runner? Parkinsons. What did Baba decide to construct and pay for in The Kite Runner? An orphanage How was amir responsible for the flight of ali and hassan? Read MoreKite Runner Reflection1367 Words   |  6 PagesAmir concludes the first chapter of The Kite Runner with a reflection, â€Å"I thought about the life I had lived until the winter of 1975 came along and changed everything. And made me what I am today† (Hosseini 2). Every action Amir takes, planned or unplanned, has an outcome that he will have to live with. For instance, the unplanned decision Amir made to hide behind a wall while his friend, Hassan, was brutally attacked and raped in 1975 has haunted him every day of his life. When Amir was youngerRead MoreTheme Of Silence In The Kite Runner999 Words   |  4 PagesHosseini’s characters in his novel The Kite Runner. These lies often result in a twisted irony and these instances of irony play pivotal roles in the novel. Whether it be Amir’s silence in Hassans rape resulting in Baba’s affection or the very foundation of Amir and Sorayaâ €™s marriage it is all tainted by a perverse irony. Not even the purity that comes with brotherhood remains unscathed by irony in the novel. All of the things that are meant to be pure in The Kite Runner are dirtied by an abundance of ironyRead MoreAlienation Amidst Dissimilarity: The Kite Runner1212 Words   |  5 Pageswithdraws or becomes isolated from other people in his or her environment. People who are alienated will often reject loved ones or society, and feel distant and estranged from their own emotions† (Alienation 1). Multiple times in the novel The Kite Runner, the protagonist, Amir, lives through an alienation that causes him to search for alternative routes in order to feel accepted. Amir struggles to stand up for himself which concerns his father, Baba, about his future well-being as an adult. TheRead MoreSummary Of The Kite Runner 1269 Words   |  6 PagesThe Kite Runner is a very powerful book that deals with many complex political and personal proble ms. This book has changed and challenged many of my views on life. I also found this book very inspiring and I have gained a greater appreciation for the life I have in Canada. Firstly, the text communicated with me through emotions. For example, I felt sadness for Hassan because of the way society treats him as an unequal. In addition, I have learned many things from this novel such as the importanceRead MoreThe Influence of Religion in the Kite Runner: Essay773 Words   |  4 PagesAll through the novel Kite Runner there are various references to Muslim tradition and beliefs, there is an instrumental role of Islam on the story and its characters. Religion seems to be many things to many people in this book. Baba is celebrated in part for his exceptionally secular ways in a traditional society. Amir exercises it in an entirely private way, as if his faith were more repentance than conversion. Hassan is a victim of discrimination and bigotry and in Assefs Taliban rendition,Read Mor eForever Typing: Use of Fatherhood in â€Å"The Kite Runner†1162 Words   |  5 Pagesâ€Å"The Kite Runner† by Kahleed Hosseini has been deemed a ‘big hit’ by Craig Wilson, journalist for USA Today, selling more than 1.4 million copies, and requiring 17 printings at the time the article was printed, April, 2005. Some have called it a â€Å"certifiable phenomena for a first-time author in today’s anemic book market† (Singh), others still have said â€Å"is about the price of peace, both personal and political† (Hill). Hosseini has already made himself a success with The Kite Runner. Hosseini, inRead MoreBelonging Romulus, My Father and the Kite Runner Essay1189 Words   |  5 Pagesbelong is true, however it may take time to belong to a certain person, place, group, community or even the larger world. This issue is explored in Raimond Gaita’s biographical memoir Romulus, My Father and Khaled Hosseini’s confronting novel The Kite Runner. Throughout these texts, the themes of personal relationships, migrant experience and morals and values arise from the concept of belonging and are explored through the use of language devices. In Romulus, My Father, Raimond Gaita explores hisRead MoreEssay about Culture and Clashes in Kite Runner1625 Words   |  7 PagesOn Culture, Clashes, and Kite Running In his novel, The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini depicts his homeland Afghanistan as a host to many different cultures and classes, such as Pashtun and Hazara, Sunni and Shiite, with this dichotomy of beliefs and attributes being powerful enough to shape diverse, sometimes negative relationships amongst the characters of the novel and their behavior to each other, as well as establish that individual’s identity. Each person interprets the impact of the role ofRead MoreThe Kite Runner By Khaled Hosseini Essay1587 Words   |  7 PagesCecilia Womack October 19th 2016 The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini The Kite Runner is based in Afghanistan where Baba and Amir his son live with also Ali and Hasaan who are like brothers to both Baba and Amir. They are living a wonderful life until Amir encounters an image he can never forget, seeing his best friend Hasaan being brutally raped. Amir fails to confront this distraught action with others and he lives with guilt and tries to cope. Still this unforgettable guilt follows him to America

Mystery Man of Stonehenge Free Essays

Archeologists were finishing excavating in Amesbury (planned development of housing) in spring, 2002. It is necessary to admit that Amesbury is situated in the southwest of England. During excavation the small Roman cemetery was uncovered by archeologists and thus that finding was considered fairly common. We will write a custom essay sample on Mystery Man of Stonehenge or any similar topic only for you Order Now Nevertheless, two skeletons were discovered and one of them was important as it was interred in grave made up of timber. The position of a mystery skeleton was rather common for burials in Bronze Age – skeleton’s legs were in a fetal position. Furthermore, skeleton had a hole in a jawbone proving that he had an abscess. The mystery man also sustained an injury as he had heavy limp as well as bone infection. That mystery skeleton was Amesbury Archer. Mystery man appeared to be a wealthy dweller of cool region in Central Europe having relation to vanguard. (Stone 2005) Firstly, it is necessary to claim that a mystery man was rather wealthy archer. According to archeologists he was between 35-45 years old and was buried â€Å"with a black stone wrist guard on his forearm of the kind used to protect archers from the snap of a bowstring†.   (Stone 2005) Sixteen flint arrowheads were scattered across his body and it was assumed that mystery man had certain relation to Stonehenge. The evidence was that massive stone monument was near the burial place. Furthermore, it was apparent that archer was wealthy, because the grave was filled with wrist guards, arrowheads, copper knives, a cache of flint tools as well as metalworking tools. Additionally the grave was arranged with stone shaped like a sofa serving as an anvil. The next evidence of wealth was a pair of gold ornaments, clay pot. Indeed the archer died rich.(Rubinstein 2005) Secondly, archer was born in a cool region in Central Europe. This fact was revealed due to archers’ mouth. Archeologists stated that tooth enamel of a person was the best way to point out his place of birth. Tooth enamel consists of oxygen, calcium and phosphorous and other elements. Actually â€Å"the composition of the oxygen molecules in apatite depends on the water a person drank as a child, and that, in turn, can reveal a great deal about where he grew up—from the temperature of rain or snow to the distance from a coast and the area’s altitude†.   (Stone 2005) The makeup of the oxygen found in archer’s teeth was scanned and thus it was determined by geoscientist Chenery (British Geological Survey) that archer was born in a cool region in Central Europe. Possibly, the archer encountered â€Å"a rural setting of round timber houses with conical thatched roofs†. (Stone 2005) Thirdly it was stated that the archer had certain relations to trade and metalworking. In those times metalworking was the most important skill. And in about 2300 B.C metal implements completely replaced stone weapons and tools which defined the era of Stone Age. The Bronze Age started in the southwest of Europe in about the 4th century B.C. as it was mentioned the grave was filled with different copper knives being used as a weapon and for eating. Cushion stone proved that archer knew how to use and why to use metal instruments. There were some suggestions that the archer belonged to the vanguard of the flashy trade producing metal items used in different shows. (Rubinstein 2005) According to archeologists the metal tool found had to be buried only with his owner. Therefore archer was skillful to move from one community to another having his knowledge in his head. It is possible to suggest that he had unique and exceptional skill for those times, because archer was similar to magician. It was revealed that the arrival of the archer completely coincided with the arrival of the metal implements to the British Isles. Thus the archer is likely to be a pioneer in the new Bronze Age. In conclusion it is necessary to outline that the mystery men was considered to be the archer who lived in the Central Europe and was busy with producing metal tools and instruments for shows. Furthermore, the time of his arrival was the beginning of the Bronze Age.   (Archaeologists Figure out Mystery 2005) References Archaeologists Figure out Mystery of Stonehenge Bluestones. (2005, June 24). Western Mail, 16. Stone, Richard. (2005, August). The Mystery Man of Stonehenge. Retrieved October, 26, 2006, from http://www.kidscastle.si.edu/issues/2005/august/stonehenge.htm Rubinstein, William. (2005, November). Mystery Identities. History Today, 55, 11, 28-34.       How to cite Mystery Man of Stonehenge, Essay examples

MPA for Case Between Rahul and Saurav- myassignmenthelp.com

Question: Write about theMPA for Case Between Rahul and Saurav. Answer: The case between Saurav and Rahul is about two friends whereby Mr. Saurav intends to buy a plane from Mr. Rahul. Rahul agreed to sell the plane to Saurav so that he may purchase a newer one. Saurav promised to pay for the plane after ten days. Because of the surety from Saurav, Rahul acquired a high interest loan and purchased the new plane. However, before the end of the ten days, Saurav pulled out of the agreement citing he has been advised by his tax accountant not to buy the plane as he is over committed on other commercial deals. Therefore, this paper examines the legal rights of Saurav in this case. Referring to the case scenario between Saurav and Rahul, it is evident that there was an oral contract. It is because Rahul provided an offer that Saurav accepted, meaning that he had an intention to buy the plane and agreed to it when he made a promise to perform his obligation within ten days. When a party failed to perform his obligation as per the contract, then he breaches the contract (Ganglmair, 2017). Breach of contract is a term that is used to describe a non-performance party in a contract. In this case, when Saurav agreed to the terms of the contract, but withdrew from it before performing his obligation, it can be said that he breached the contract between him and Rahul. Moreover, a valid contract must contain the element of consideration exchange in the agreement. Consideration may be money or something valuable (Walkley, 2016). It can also include interest, a right, or benefit. The parties involved must benefit in one way or the other. In this case Saurav was to get the plane while in return Rahul was to get money. Moreover, for Saurav to withdraw from the agreement he needs to know that Rahul has legal rights to performance, right to damages, and fundamental breach among others. Under specific performance, Rahul can sue him by failing to perform his obligation as per the agreement (Atwell, 2015). It means that if the parties agreed to the terms as to performance of a contract, the court can enforce the said obligations as provided under commercial law. Rahul can also claim for damages he incurred due to the agreement he entered into with Saurav. The compensation for such damages is supposed to take him back into the position he was in if he could have not entered into the contract. Other than that, Rahul still has the right under fundamental breach. Due to the situation the breach put him into, he can say that the breach substantially deprive him what he expected under the contract (Ganglmair, 2017). Therefore, for Saurav to be excused from the liabilities, he must prove that the breach was no t foreseeable. The Case between a Guarantor and Australian Bank For many years there has been an increment litigation concerning the enforcement of the commercial guaranties by lenders. Due to the increase in defaulting by borrowers on their loan obligations, banks in many cases have taken action against guarantors for them to recover damages arising from the borrowers default. Here is the case where an Australian bank is facing the same scenario. The case involves a mother who guaranteed her sons loan business loan from the bank using her home. She signed the guarantors agreement based on the trust she has on her son. Being that she was not conversant with English, the bank advised her to seek an independent legal advice before an experienced, certified interpreter before signing any document that guarantees business loan to her son. In less than two years later, Mings business faced problems from a significant legal ruling that made his business to face insolvency. Counter Argument In the case Blest v. Brown (1862) case, Lord Westbury said that surety must always be collected in whatever manner a surety is bound. The court said that beyond a proper interpretation of the engagement, the guarantor receives no benefit or consideration beyond the proper interpretation. Guarantor is bound to proper effect and meaning of the written agreement that she signed (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2014). But, in case there is any alteration in the written agreement whether it is to the benefits of the guarantor, even if there it is an innocent alteration, the guarantor has the right to say that her obligation is over. It is because the contract no longer fits the conditions of engagement. Other than that, it was stated in a Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce v. Patel (1990) that a principal debtor clause changes a person who has guaranteed someone else into a full-fledged debtor (Australia Banking, 2016). However, if the guarantor is to treated as the such, she must get notification from the bank stating the renewal agreements and the new terms. In case the bank fails to notify the guarantor about the new developments, she must get relieved from her initial obligations. Remedies In most cases under the principles of Interpretation the guarantees and guarantors are accorded with a contract of adhesive. This means that the documents are prepared by the bank on a standard form. Therefore, the borrower and the guarantor have no part in the agreement negotiation. They are left with no option but to sign if the loan was to be granted. It happens when the guarantor is a family member like in the Mrs. Mings case where she had limited commercial experience. For the sake of accommodation, she willingly signed the guarantee. Because of her lack of knowledge on what she was doing, her favor to her son led her to financial tragedy. Because the guarantor had no control over the situation, it would be advisable that she applies for contra proferentem rule. It is the reasonable and satisfactory means of tackling the situation since the banks that always draft these accords can easily amend their documents to ensure that they do not have any ambiguity. The contra proferentem rule is vital in situations where the construed clause creates limitation of liability (Bishop, Snowling, Thompson, Greenhalgh null, 2016). Where there is only one sensible interpretation, the guarantor should understand should be able to understand. In such cases the contra proferentum rule is not applicable. However, in if there are two or more interpretations available that might be sensible; the guarantor should get construed against the party that prepared it. In the case of Mrs. Ming, the court should have looked for an interpreter who could have interpreted the contents of the documents in Mandarin, Cantonese or Shanghai languages for h er to understand before allowing her sign. The law also states that if there is ambiguity as to the meaning of the clauses that binds the guarantor, there must be a clear interpretation and the resolution made must favor the guarantor. Moreover, under accommodation sureties, the guarantor expects little or no remuneration. Because of assisting others to accomplish their plans without expecting anything in return, the protection is offered. An example of the accommodation sureties application was in the Assurance Co. v. Johns-Manville Canada Inc., (1983). The law has been put in place to protect such guarantors by strictly construing their obligations and reducing to them the consequences terms of the contract of surety (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 2014). Moreover, the guarantor who has right of material alteration by virtue of principle debtor clause, may waive these rights by the terms of the contract. Possibilities of the Bank Making a Crime There are various possibilities of the bank making a crime. Firstly, if the bank intends to change the obligations of the principal debtor and make the guarantor the principle debtor, it must notify the respondent. Failure to notify the guarantor about the renewal agreement and the new terms, the bank must release her from the contract (Australia Banking, 2016). In this case, being that the bank wants Mrs. Ming to take the responsibilities of his son without notifying her about the new developments may make the bank lose the case against her. If the bank proceeded to take her home without the renewal agreement then it will be a crime. Additionally, being that there was an ambiguity in the interpretation of the contract; the bank cannot be allowed to take Mrs. Ming home. It is because the law requires that there must be clear interpretation of the clauses that binds the guarantor in the agreement (Bell, 2017). If the bank has not strictly construed the clauses that bind the guarantor, then, holding her responsible will be a breach of commercial law. Further, being that Mrs. Ming intensions was to assist his son acquire the loan without benefiting from the loan; she is also protected under accommodation sureties. Consequently, the bank cannot bank take their property because the law strictly construed her obligations and limited her to precise terms of the contract of surety (Mullen, 2016). Again goes against such laws may land the bank into crime. References Atwell, C. (2015). Cooling off periods in franchise contracts: from consumer protection mechanisms to paternalistic remedies for behavioral biases. Business Politics, 17(4), 697-721. Australia Banking. (2016). Acquisdata Industry SnapShots: Australia Banking, (5104), 1-98. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2014). Travel Law Quarterly, 6(4), 338-339. Bell, L. (2017). Boundary Dispute: The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality as Judicial Nondelegation. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2017(2), 427-485. Bishop, D. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., Greenhalgh, T., null, n. (2016). CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children. Ganglmair, B. (2017). Efficient Material Breach of Contract. Journal Of Law, Economics Organization, 33(3), 507-540. Mullen, S. (2016). Damages for Breach of Contract: Quantifying the Lost Consumer Surplus. Oxford Journal Of Legal Studies, 36(1), 83-109. Walkley, P. (2016). What turns buyers off. Money (Australia Edition), (195), 69.